2024 Virgina Races: Candidate Comparisons 

Virginia Candidates for US Senate: Hung Cao vs. Tim Kaine 

Hung Cao is pro-life. He opposes abortion on demand, and he supports protection for unborn children.

Hung Cao opposes the use of our tax dollars for abortion. He also opposes taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

Hung Cao will vote to advance more care for women facing complicated pregnancy situations. Women are not helped by an agenda that protects abortionists. Cao will support better maternal health care and more assistance to prevent fetal and infant mortality in Virginia and the U.S.

“I am pro-life. Make no mistake: the right to life is one of the biggest differences between me and Tim Kaine. I am the father of five children, and I spent a lifetime fighting for all Americans.” -From the candidate’s website



Tim Kaine supports a policy of abortion on demand, which allows abortion for any reason until birth. He opposes any efforts to protect women and unborn children from abortion.

Tim Kaine supports the so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act.” This bill would not only enshrine unlimited abortion in federal law, but it would also override all the protective laws already passed in many states since Dobbs.

Tim Kaine supports using your tax dollars to pay for more abortions. He wants to remove the Hyde Amendment that prevents our taxes from paying for all abortions under federal health programs.

Tim Kaine opposes rational bills that would protect women and that expand opportunities to provide life-affirming options, including the “Supporting Pregnant and Parenting Women and Families Act” and the “Pregnant Students’ Rights Act.” 

Cao vs. Kaine Comparison for Print: vshl.org/…/2024-Comparison-Piece-US-Sen-CD2-1.pdf

Candidates for US House: 2nd Congressional District

Jen Kiggans is pro-life. She opposes abortion on demand, and she supports protection for unborn children.

Jen Kiggans opposes the use of our tax dollars for abortion. She also opposes taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

Jen Kiggans will vote to advance more care for women facing complicated pregnancy situations and knows women are not helped by an agenda that protects abortionists. Kiggans supports better maternal health care and more assistance to prevent fetal and infant mortality in Virginia and the U.S.

Missy Cotter-Smasal lists “Abortion Access & the Right to Choose” as her top issue on her campaign website. Her top priority is to “restore Roe v. Wade into law,” which legalized abortion for any reason until birth.

Missy Cotter Smasal supports using your tax dollars to pay for abortion.

Missy Cotter Smasal supports the so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act.” This bill would enshrine unlimited abortion in federal law, and it would override all the protective laws enacted in many states since Dobbs.

Kiggans vs. Smasal Comparison for Print: vshl.org/…/2024-Comparison-Piece-US-Sen-CD2-1.pdf

Candidates for US House: 5th Congressional District

John McGuire is pro-life. He opposes abortion on demand, and he supports protection for unborn children.

John McGuire opposes the use of our tax dollars for abortion. He also opposes taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

John McGuire will vote to advance more care for women facing complicated pregnancy situations and knows women are not helped by an agenda that protects abortionists. He supports better maternal health care and more assistance to prevent fetal and infant mortality in Virginia and the U.S.

Gloria Tinsley-Witt lists “Restore Reproductive Rights,” a euphemism for abortion, as a top issue on her campaign website. She will vote to restore Roe nationwide, which legalized abortion for any reason until birth.

Gloria Tinsley Witt supports using your tax dollars to pay for abortion.

Gloria Tinsley Witt supports the so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act.” This bill would enshrine unlimited abortion in federal law, and it would override all the protective laws enacted in many states since Dobbs. 

McGuire vs. Tinsley Witt comparison for print:  vshl.org/…/2024-Comparison-Piece-US-Sen-CD5-1.pdf

Candidates for US House: 7th Congressional District

Derrick Anderson is pro-life. He opposes abortion on demand, and he supports protection for unborn children.

Derrick Anderson opposes the use of our tax dollars for abortion. He also opposes taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

Derrick Anderson will vote to advance more care for women facing complicated pregnancy situations and knows women are not helped by an agenda that protects abortionists. He supports better maternal health care and more assistance to prevent fetal and infant mortality in Virginia and the U.S.

 

Eugene Vindman lists Abortion Access as his top issue on his campaign website. His top priority is to “restore the protections of Roe nationwide,” which legalized abortion for any reason until birth.

Eugene Vindman supports using your tax dollars to pay for abortion.

Eugene Vindman supports the so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act.” This bill would enshrine unlimited abortion in federal law, and it would override all the protective laws enacted in many states since Dobbs.

Anderson vs Vindman Comparison for print: vshl.org/…/2024-Comparison-Piece-US-Sen-CD7-1.pdf

Candidates for US House: 10th Congressional District

Mike Clancy is pro-life. He opposes abortion on demand, and he supports protection for unborn children.

Mike Clancy opposes the use of our tax dollars for abortion. He also opposes taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

Mike Clancy will vote to advance more care for women facing complicated pregnancy situations and knows women are not helped by an agenda that protects abortionists. He supports better maternal health care and more assistance to prevent fetal and infant mortality in Virginia and the U.S.


Suhas Subramanyam lists Abortion Access as his top issue on his campaign website. His top priority is to “restore the protections of Roe nationwide,” which legalized abortion for any reason until birth.

Suhas Subramanyam supports using your tax dollars to pay for abortion.

Suhas Subramanyam supports the so-called “Women’s Health Protection Act.” This bill would enshrine unlimited abortion in federal law, and it would override all the protective laws enacted in many states since Dobbs.

Clancy Vs. Subramanyam Comparison for Print:  vshl.org/…/2024-Comparison-Piece-US-Sen-CD10-1.pdf