Where do the the US House District 7 Candidates Stand

Nick Freitas vs. Abigail Spanberger

                   

Abortion on Demand

There have been 61 million abortions since the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision legalized abortion on demand. 

Nick Freitas

Nick Freitas is pro-life. He opposes abortion on demand, and he supports protection for unborn children.
Nick Freitas had a 100% pro-life voting record in the General Assembly, as rated by the Virginia Society of Human Life.

Abigail Spanberger

Abigail Spanberger supports a policy of abortion on demand, which allows abortion for any reason.
Abigail Spanberger has a 0% pro-life voting record in Congress, as rated by the National Right to Life Committee.

Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act

The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would protect unborn children by prohibiting abortion after the point in pregnancy at which the unborn child is capable of experiencing great pain when being killed by dismemberment or other late abortion methods.

Nick Freitas

Nick Freitas supports the bill that would prohibit abortions after the unborn child can feel pain.

Abigail Spanberger

Abigail Spanberger opposes legislation that would prohibit abortions after the unborn child can feel pain.

Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would require that a baby born alive during an abortion be afforded the same degree of care that would apply to any other baby delivered at the same gestational age.

Nick Freitas

Nick Freitas supports the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Abigail Spanberger

Abigail Spanberger voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

Taxpayer Funding of Abortion

Prohibiting taxpayer funding of abortion saves lives.

Nick Freitas

Nick Freitas opposes the use of our tax dollars for abortion.  He also opposes taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

Abigail Spanberger

Abigail Spanberger voted to allow the use of our tax dollars for abortion. She also voted for taxpayer funding of abortion providers.

Conscience Protections

It is essential to each health care provider’s Constitutional, civil and human rights that individuals are neither forced to perform, nor retaliated upon or otherwise discriminated against for refusing to participate in, procedures that violate their consciences, including abortion or assisted suicide.

Nick Freitas

Nick Freitas supports health care workers’ freedom to refuse to participate in abortions and other procedures that violate their consciences.

Abigail Spanberger

Abigail Spanberger voted against protecting the conscience rights of health care workers.


Please share this information with your pro-life family and friends.  Urge them to vote this November.

Please use this link to share this webpage with your friends and family
Please use this link to download and share a PDF version of this candidate comparison.


Candidate Comparisons for other 2020 Virginia Races

US Senate: Gade vs. Warner
House of Representatives District One:  Whitman vs. Rashid
House of Representatives District Two: Luria vs. Taylor  
House of Representatives District Three:  Scott vs. Collick
House of Representatives District Four:  McEachin vs. Benjamin
House of Representatives District Five:  Good vs. Webb
House of Representatives District Six:  Cline vs. Betts
House of Representatives District Seven:  Spanberger vs. Freitas
House of Representatives District Eight:  Beyer vs. Jordan
House of Representatives District Nine:  Griffith (unopposed)
House of Representatives District Ten:  Wexton  vs. Andrews
House of Representatives District Eleven:  Connolly vs. Anantatmula


VSHL 2020 Election Central 

 

You May Also Like

Action Alert: Urge Senator Warner & Kaine to Vote to Confirm Judge Barrett

An Evening to Benefit Virginia Pro-Life Activities

2020 Virginia Pro-life Election Central

Stop the Right-to-Abortion Amendment to the Virginia Constitution Action Center